Poland's Energy Security Within European Union After February 24, 2022
More details
Hide details
1
Wydział Humanistyczny
Politechniki Koszalińskiej Europeistyka, Politechnika Koszalińska, Poland
Submission date: 2025-05-16
Final revision date: 2026-01-31
Acceptance date: 2026-03-05
Online publication date: 2026-03-24
Publication date: 2026-03-24
Corresponding author
Maria Izabela Giryn-Boudy
Wydział Humanistyczny
Politechniki Koszalińskiej Europeistyka, Politechnika Koszalińska, ul. Kwiatkowskiego 6e, 75-343, Koszalin, Poland
Przegląd Nauk o Obronności 2025;(21):121-129
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The objective of this paper is to analyse the evolution of Poland’s energy security strategy within the European Union before and after 24 February 2022 and to identify key challenges and policy responses. The research hypothesis assumes that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has accelerated the transition of Poland and the EU towards greater energy independence and diversification.
Methods:
The study adopts a qualitative research design based on a meta-analytical approach. A systematic review of academic literature and policy documents was conducted. The source base comprises three groups of materials: peer-reviewed academic publications indexed in Scopus, European Union policy and legal documents, including REPowerEU and Fit for 55, and Polish strategic documents, in particular the Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 (PEP2040) and the National Energy and Climate Plan to 2030. The empirical background relies on official statistical data. Eurostat data for 2018–2024 were used to analyse energy balances, import dependency and the structure of energy consumption.
Results:
The findings indicate that Poland has achieved substantial progress in energy supply diversification, primarily through infrastructure investments such as the Baltic Pipe and the expansion of LNG terminals. The effectiveness of diversification measures remains dependent on the consistent implementation of PEP2040 and on institutional integration with EU energy policy frameworks.
Conclusions:
The analysis confirms that the war in Ukraine has accelerated structural changes in Poland’s energy security policy, including supply diversification, infrastructure expansion and a marked reduction of dependence on Russian energy resources. Long-term energy security remains conditional.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Baev, P. K., & Øverland, I. (2010). The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: Geopolitical and economic (ir)rationales and political stakes in mega-projects. International Affairs, 86(5), 1075–1090.
2.
Boussena, S., & Locatelli, C. (2017). Energy institutional and policy reforms in the EU: The challenge of reconciling market and public intervention. Energy Policy.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
3.
Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2012). Insufficient climate policy integration in EU energy policy: The importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(2).
4.
Humphrey, C., Kausar, A., Loft, A., & Woods, M. (2011). Regulating audit beyond the crisis: A critical discussion of the EU Green Paper. European Accounting Review, 20(3), 431–457.
https://www.researchgate.net/p....
5.
Jędrak, J. (2022). By wygrać z Putinem, musimy poświęcić trochę swojego komfortu. Skorzysta na tym jakość powietrza i klimat. SmogLab.
https://smoglab.pl/koniec-impo....
6.
Kaczmarek, K. (2020). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne państwa w obliczu pandemii COVID 19 na przykładzie Republiki Finlandii. Cybersecurity and Law, 3(1), 175–190.
7.
Kalicki, J. H., & Goldwyn, D. L. (2005). Energy and Security: Toward a New Foreign Policy Strategy. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press / Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Klare, M. T. (2008). Energy Security. In P. D. Williams (Ed.), Security Studies: An Introduction. Routledge.
9.
Le Coq, C., & Paltseva, E. (2022). The EU's energy security in the wake of the Russo–Ukrainian war: Challenges and policy responses. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, 100899.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.....
10.
Misiągiewicz, J. (2019). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Unii Europejskiej. Implikacje nowych projektów infrastruktury gazociągowej w Europie. Lublin: UMCS.
11.
Muszyńska, A., & Mańk, R. (2015). Unia Europejska i Federacja Rosyjska – porównanie skuteczności prowadzenia polityki bezpieczeństwa energetycznego na przykładzie gazociągów Nabucco i Gazociągu Południowego. TEKA of Political Science and International Relations, 9, 133–152.
12.
Paczkowska, A., Paradowska, A., Nowak, W., Ozimek, T., & Pałka, Z. (2008). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Unii Europejskiej. Implikacje dla Polski. In A. Nowak Far (Ed.), Unia Europejska wobec współczesnych problemów polityki (pp. 135–156). Warszawa: KSAP.
https://m.ksap.gov.pl/sites/de....
13.
Pronińska, K. (2006). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne w stosunkach międzynarodowych – aspekty strategiczne. In E. Halizak et al. (Eds.), Stosunki międzynarodowe w XXI wieku. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
15.
Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G., & MacKerron, G. (2020). Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nature Energy.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560....
16.
Sovacool, B. K., et al. (2023). Balancing energy security and decarbonisation in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 99, 103050.
17.
Stachowiak, Z. (2006). Ekonomiczny wymiar bezpieczeństwa narodowego. In E. Halizak et al. (Eds.), Stosunki międzynarodowe w XXI wieku. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
18.
Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: Between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5).
https://doi.org/10.1080/146930....