Sectoral Sanctions as a Means of Undermining the National Security of the Russian Federation
More details
Hide details
1
National Security Department, War Studies University, Poland
Submission date: 2026-02-15
Final revision date: 2026-04-13
Acceptance date: 2026-04-18
Online publication date: 2026-05-05
Publication date: 2026-05-05
Corresponding author
Katarzyna Chabska
National Security Department, War Studies University, al. gen. A. Chruściela „Montera” 103, 00-910, Warsaw, Poland
Przegląd Nauk o Obronności 2025;(22):4-20
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Objectives Sectoral sanctions are a policy instrument situated at the intersection of economic governance and national security strategy, intended to weaken rival states by targeting key areas of their economies. They explore the prerequisites for their effectiveness, namely coordination, flexibility, proportionality, and adherence to international norms, and evaluate their practical consequences in the case of the Russian Federation. The study contends that, despite generating measurable economic pressure, the overall impact of these sanctions has been limited, as Russia has demonstrated economic adaptability, mitigated the effects of restrictions, strengthened its military capacity, and intensified strategic ties with China, Iran, and North Korea. The findings suggest that sanctions can achieve their intended strategic outcomes only if they are implemented rigorously and sustained over time. However, their effectiveness is shaped by the evolving international system, which is no longer centered exclusively on the Western cultural sphere. Sectoral sanctions can serve as an important instrument of deterrence in international politics when cooperating state partners are united.
Material and Methods:
Qualitative content analysis of academic literature, policy documents, and strategic reports. Comparative analysis of Western and Russian approaches to national security and sanctions policy
Results:
Sanctions must be implemented in a comprehensive and coordinated manner, otherwise, they are unlikely to produce the intended outcomes or meaningfully impact the national security apparatus of the targeted state.
Conclusions:
Sectoral sanctions serve as a vital instrument, forming a central component of a national security doctrine focused on self-driven development, the continuity of strategic planning, and the formulation of a comprehensive state's grand strategy.
REFERENCES (34)
2.
Blatin, S. V. (2014). Gosudarstvennaya bezopasnost Rossiiskoi Federatsii: stanovlenie i sovremennoe soderzhanie ponyatiya [State security of the Russian Federation: Formation and contemporary content of the concept]. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4(60).
3.
Cebula, K. (2015). Przedmiot, zakres i miejsce nauk o bezpieczeństwie wśród innych dyscyplin naukowych. In W. Kitler & T. Kośmider (Eds.), Metodologiczne i dydaktyczne aspekty bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Defin.
4.
Chojnowski, L. (2015). Podmiotowo-przedmiotowe ramy analizy bezpieczeństwa a jego naukowa multidyscyplinarność. In W. Kitler & T. Kośmider (Eds.), Metodologiczne i dydaktyczne aspekty bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Defin.
5.
Czupryński, A., Wiśniewski, B., & Zboina, J. (2017). Nauki o bezpieczeństwie. Wybrane problemy badań. CNBOP-PIB.
6.
Damm, I. A. (2019). Approaches to the definition of security in the legislation of the Russian Federation. Juridical Science and Practice, 15(1).
7.
Daniluk, P. (2013). Metodologia badań zagrożeń wynikających z kryzysu społeczno-ekonomicznego. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego, 2012/2013.
9.
Duraj, N. (2021). Bezpieczeństwo państwa a bezpieczeństwo narodowe Federacji Rosyjskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
10.
Fleming, S., Jones, C., & Seddon, M. (2024). IMF raises Russia growth outlook as war boosts economy. Financial Times.
https://www.ft.com/content/21a... (accessed: 22.09.2025).
11.
Garina, O. V. (2010). K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatii “bezopasnost” i “natsionalnaya bezopasnost”. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, (1).
12.
Glen, A. (2011). Wyłanianie się nauk o bezpieczeństwie. Zeszyty Naukowe AON, 2(83).
13.
Goncharov, I. V. (2009). On the correlation of the concepts “national security” and “state security”. Actual Problems of Russian Law, (1).
14.
Helnarska, K. J. (2015). Jak budować tożsamość nauk o bezpieczeństwie. In W. Kitler & T. Kośmider (Eds.), Metodologiczne i dydaktyczne aspekty bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Defin.
15.
Iroshnikov, D. V. (2013). State security as a legal category. Vestnik RUDN. Legal Sciences, (3).
17.
Jermano, J. (2018). Economic and financial sanctions in U.S. national security strategy. PRISM, 7(4).
18.
Kazakov, N. (1994). Safety and synergetics. Safety. Information Collection, 4.
19.
Kissinger, H. (2015). World order. Penguin.
20.
Kitler, W. (2011). Bezpieczeństwo narodowe RP. AON.
21.
Kitler, W. (2015). Transdyscyplinarność badań. In W. Kitler & T. Kośmider (Eds.), Metodologiczne i dydaktyczne aspekty bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Defin.
22.
Kozub, M. (2015). Myśleć strategicznie o bezpieczeństwie przyszłości. AON.
23.
Madej, A. (2015). Sankcje a kontrsankcje. BBN.
24.
Nowakowski, Z., & Szafran, H. (2009). Bezpieczeństwo XXI wieku. RS Druk.
25.
Olak, A. (2016). Modern understanding of national security. Security Dimensions, 18.
27.
Sarau, E. D. (2024). Economic sanctions and trade dynamics. Russian Journal of Economics, 10(3).
28.
Sienkiewicz, P. (2010). Metody badań nad bezpieczeństwem. AON.
29.
Stepashin, S. (1994). Security of man and society. St. Petersburg Institute.
33.
Wróblewski, R. (2015). Od nauk wojskowych do nauk o bezpieczeństwie. In W. Kitler & T. Kośmider (Eds.), Metodologiczne i dydaktyczne aspekty bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Defin.
34.
Zięba, R. (2012). O tożsamości nauk o bezpieczeństwie. Zeszyty Naukowe AON, 1(86).