State Security and Supply Chains under Non-Kinetic Pressure
More details
Hide details
1
Politechnika Koszalińska, Poland
2
Wydział Humanistyczny, Politechnika Koszalińska, Poland
Submission date: 2026-02-22
Final revision date: 2026-03-30
Acceptance date: 2026-04-18
Online publication date: 2026-05-06
Publication date: 2026-05-06
Przegląd Nauk o Obronności 2025;(22):49-58
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The objective of the article is to analyse supply chains as an element of state security under conditions of non-kinetic influence. Particular attention is given to mechanisms of interference within supply chains and their consequences for the state’s capacity to respond, taking into account structural complexity, multi-stage organisation, and the limited detectability of such actions.
Methods:
The article is based on a qualitative comparative analysis employing a polemological approach and the case study method. The analysis relies on triangulation of secondary sources, including institutional reports, industry materials, academic literature, and documented cases of supply chain interference, which enables the identification of recurring patterns and mechanisms of influence.
Results:
The results indicate that the vulnerability of supply chains is structural in nature and derives from their complexity, the dispersion of responsibility, and the selective and probabilistic character of control mechanisms. The analysis demonstrates that interference can be effectively embedded in routine and legally functioning economic processes, including the digital and informational layer, which facilitates the accumulation of effects and the emergence of cascading impacts at later stages of supply chain operation.
Conclusions:
The article confirms that disruptions to supply chains may be employed as a tool of long-term, non-kinetic influence on the state, leading to a gradual weakening of institutional response capacities. From the perspective of state security, this necessitates treating supply chains as a permanent space of vulnerability, requiring an analytical approach that goes beyond logistics and procedural compliance.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Anzoom, R., Nagi, R., & Vogiatzis, C. (2021). A review of research in illicit supply-chain networks and new directions to thwart them. IISE Transactions, 54(2), 134–158.
https://doi.org/10.1080/247258....
2.
Ashraf, M., Eltawil, A., & Ali, I. (2024). Disruption detection for a cognitive digital supply chain twin using hybrid deep learning. Operational Research, 24(2), 23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351....
4.
Dash, A., Sarmah, S. P., Tiwari, M. K., Jena, S. K., & Glock, C. H. (2024). Cybersecurity investments in supply chains with two-stage risk propagation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 197, 110519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.....
5.
Dolgui, A., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Ripple effect and supply chain disruption management: New trends and research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 102–109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002075....
6.
Emrouznejad, A., Abbasi, S., & Sıcakyüz, Ç. (2023). Supply chain risk management: A content analysis-based review of existing and emerging topics. Supply Chain Analytics, 3, 100031.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.....
7.
Ghadge, A., Er, M., Ivanov, D., & Chaudhuri, A. (2022). Visualisation of ripple effect in supply chains under long-term, simultaneous disruptions: A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Production Research, 60(20), 6173–6186.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002075....
8.
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107921.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
9.
Karklina-Admine, S., Cevers, A., Kovalenko, A., & Auzins, A. (2024). Challenges for customs risk management today: A literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), 321.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17....
10.
Lehdonvirta, V., Wú, B., & Hawkins, Z. (2025). Weaponised interdependence in a bipolar world. Review of International Political Economy, 32(5), 1442–1467.
https://doi.org/10.1080/096922....
11.
Li, Y., & Zobel, C. W. (2020). Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
12.
Monostori, J. (2021). Mitigation of the ripple effect in supply chains. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 32, 370–381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp....
14.
Namdar, J., Blackhurst, J., Zhao, K., & Song, S. (2024). Cascading disruptions: Impact of modularity and nexus supplier predictions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 60(3), 18–38.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.1....
17.
Sodhi, M. S., Roscoe, S., Ellram, L. M., Tang, C., Sarkis, J., Handfield, R. B., Roehrich, J. K., & Schleper, M. C. (2025). Infiltration, interdiction, and other covert supply chain operations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 45(13), 233–252.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-....
19.
Wang, T. C. (2025). Development of a cost-effective inspection scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 288, 109714.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....